As published in the Annals ofCardiothoracic Surgery November 2012 issue.
There
is no doubt that malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) needs better non-invasive
and accurate prognostication (the ability to predict medical outcomes of a
treatment or disease) for several reasons, including but not limited to the
following: a median survival of 12 months with first line therapy; a median
survival of 24 months when treated in a multimodal approach; a staging system
currently undergoing a major update, not to mention the diffuse nature of the
disease and its variable biology.
Better
prognostication in MPM would mean the ability to better differentiate among
patients, hopefully at the time of diagnosis. For patients with a poor
prognostic, either palliative therapy or no therapy may be appropriate. If
prognostic factors indicate that long term survival is possible, aggressive
treatment or novel protocols would be justified.
Typically,
prognostication in MPM has been approached by studying many variables, usually
one at a time and at many centers, all with limited numbers of patients. This
is approach is problematic because prognostication cannot function in a vacuum
and the majority of these findings remain unsubstantiated in other MPM
populations. For example, Although MPM patients tend to be older individuals
who are frequently functionally impaired and may have difficulty with
aggressive therapy, there is still a significant number of MPM patients with a favorable
biology in a multimodal approach, who benefit from intense therapy.
Such
variables that can be studied can be purely clinical, such as patient
demographics that are frequently combined with standard laboratory values
including white blood cell count or platelet count. Other scientists have focused
on radiologic parameters by examining CT and PET scans.
Some of
the most advanced research being accomplished today uses a molecular pathologic
approach, by studying genomics, microRNA, epigenetics or proteomics in order to
define single or combinations of candidate prognostic biomarkers from tissue or
blood. The future of prognostic biomarkers in
MPM will most likely involve a multi-institutional consortium of centers which
will harvest tissue, blood and other specimens in a protocol using the same
standard operating procedures in order to minimize extraneous differences which
could lead to false positive results.
As new research platforms develop, it will be crucial to make
sure that an ongoing registry which incorporates solid demographics as well as
documentation of specimen archiving be available to the mesothelioma community.
At this time the National Mesothelioma Virtual Tissue Bank fulfills that role
in the United States, and is adding new sites to ensure that substances and
tissues for MPM prognostication will be available for continuing research.